Skip to main content

What Is Original Sin and Why Must It Be Forgiven?

It's a question many of us have asked: if we weren't around to eat the forbidden fruit, why do we need to be forgiven for original sin? The Catholic Church has a profound answer, one that distinguishes between the personal sin of Adam and Eve and the fallen state we all inherit. The Church teaches that we cannot be guilty of another's personal sin. That would be metaphysically and scripturally absurd. Instead, Adam and Eve alone committed the personal act of original sin. What we inherit is not their action, but a state of being—a "sin" by analogy, not a personal sin. This inherited condition represents a real and proper sin that must be addressed, even though it's in its own unique category.

This distinction is crucial. When the Church calls original sin a "sin," it is not using the term in the same way we talk about personal sins like lying or stealing. Original sin is not an act we commit, but a fallen state of human nature we receive through propagation. As the Catechism puts it, "The whole human race is in Adam 'as one body of one man.'" We are all implicated in his sin, just as we are all implicated in Christ's righteousness. This is why original sin is called a sin "contracted" and not "committed." It's a mysterious reality that our human nature was deprived of its original holiness and justice, and it's this very deprivation that is transmitted to us.

Another key distinction to make is between original sin and concupiscence. While original sin is a true sin—a state of being that must be cleansed by baptism—concupiscence is something else entirely. It's the inclination or tendency toward sin that remains even after we're baptized and original sin is remitted. The Council of Trent clarifies that concupiscence is not "truly and properly sin" in those who have been reborn. St. Paul calls it "sin that dwells in me" because it stems from sin and inclines us to it, but it's not a sin in and of itself. Therefore, concupiscence doesn't need to be forgiven, but rather healed.

In summary, original sin is a "true and proper sin," but for us, it's a state of being, not a personal act. Because it is a real sin, it must be cleansed through baptism. Concupiscence, on the other hand, is a consequence of the Fall—a proclivity toward sin—but it is not a sin itself. It does not require forgiveness, but it will be fully healed at the resurrection of the body. Understanding these distinctions helps us grasp the profound mystery of how Adam's one act could have such a lasting impact on all of humanity, and how Christ's redemptive act provides the ultimate healing.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Praying With The Five Wounds Of Jesus

I am just beginning to dive into the beautiful, ancient devotion to the Five Wounds of Jesus, and I wanted to share a bit of the journey with you. It can feel a little overwhelming at first to look at the Crucifix this closely, but I’ve found such a gentle guide in St. Bernard of Clairvaux . In his Jubilee Rhythm on the Passion, Bernard doesn't treat the wounds of Jesus as distant historical facts or sights to be avoided. Instead, he approaches them with the tenderness of a friend, speaking directly to the feet, hands, side, and face of our Lord. For someone like me who is just starting out, his rhythm teaches that prayer isn't just about reciting words; it’s a holy hide-and-seek. Bernard invites us to literally hide ourselves within these wounds, seeing them as clefts in the rock where we can find shelter when our own lives feel turbulent or heavy. As I start this process, I’ve been practicing what I call gazing and greeting. Following Bernard’s lead, I look at the Crucifix an...
Post a Comment
Read more

Woman, Behold Your Son

The spiritual climax of the Gospel of John, as Father John Waiss points out, occurs at the foot of the Cross, where Jesus utters his parting words: “Woman, behold, your son!” and “Behold your mother!” (John 19:26-27). While these words were addressed to the Apostle John, the disciple whom Jesus loved, the Church has long understood this moment as a universal adoption. To truly image Christ, we must share in His parentage; if we embrace God as our spiritual Father but reject Mary as our mother, we treat Christ as a half-brother rather than our "firstborn among many brethren" (Rom. 8:29). As Origen noted as early as the third century, the profound depths of the Gospel are only accessible to those who, like John, rest their heads on Jesus’ breast and receive Mary into their own homes. This maternal role is deeply rooted in biblical typology, positioning Mary as the fulfillment of the great mothers of the Old Covenant. She is the New Eve , the mother of all the living according ...
Post a Comment
Read more

From Fisherman to Foremen: Peter’s First Act as Shepherd

In the immediate aftermath of the Ascension, we see a profound transformation in Peter, moving from the impulsive fisherman who once fled in the garden to the courageous shepherd of the early Church. By standing up in the heart of Jerusalem to deliver his first great "sermon" at Pentecost, Peter is not merely offering an inspired speech; he is stepping into the primordial role of the Papacy. He was specifically commissioned by Christ on the shores of Galilee to "feed my sheep," and here we see that nourishment take the form of the Word. He takes control of a frightened and confused community, providing the definitive interpretation of the Resurrection and anchoring the fledgling Church in the truth of the Gospel. This moment in the Acts of the Apostles reminds us that the authority of Peter was never about personal power, but about the sacred duty of unity and guidance. By taking the lead in the upper room and before the crowds, Peter demonstrates that the "key...
Post a Comment
Read more