Skip to main content

What Is Original Sin and Why Must It Be Forgiven?

It's a question many of us have asked: if we weren't around to eat the forbidden fruit, why do we need to be forgiven for original sin? The Catholic Church has a profound answer, one that distinguishes between the personal sin of Adam and Eve and the fallen state we all inherit. The Church teaches that we cannot be guilty of another's personal sin. That would be metaphysically and scripturally absurd. Instead, Adam and Eve alone committed the personal act of original sin. What we inherit is not their action, but a state of being—a "sin" by analogy, not a personal sin. This inherited condition represents a real and proper sin that must be addressed, even though it's in its own unique category.

This distinction is crucial. When the Church calls original sin a "sin," it is not using the term in the same way we talk about personal sins like lying or stealing. Original sin is not an act we commit, but a fallen state of human nature we receive through propagation. As the Catechism puts it, "The whole human race is in Adam 'as one body of one man.'" We are all implicated in his sin, just as we are all implicated in Christ's righteousness. This is why original sin is called a sin "contracted" and not "committed." It's a mysterious reality that our human nature was deprived of its original holiness and justice, and it's this very deprivation that is transmitted to us.

Another key distinction to make is between original sin and concupiscence. While original sin is a true sin—a state of being that must be cleansed by baptism—concupiscence is something else entirely. It's the inclination or tendency toward sin that remains even after we're baptized and original sin is remitted. The Council of Trent clarifies that concupiscence is not "truly and properly sin" in those who have been reborn. St. Paul calls it "sin that dwells in me" because it stems from sin and inclines us to it, but it's not a sin in and of itself. Therefore, concupiscence doesn't need to be forgiven, but rather healed.

In summary, original sin is a "true and proper sin," but for us, it's a state of being, not a personal act. Because it is a real sin, it must be cleansed through baptism. Concupiscence, on the other hand, is a consequence of the Fall—a proclivity toward sin—but it is not a sin itself. It does not require forgiveness, but it will be fully healed at the resurrection of the body. Understanding these distinctions helps us grasp the profound mystery of how Adam's one act could have such a lasting impact on all of humanity, and how Christ's redemptive act provides the ultimate healing.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Doctrinal Clarity, Not Change: Unpacking the Note on Marian Titles

The release of the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith’s note, Mater Populi Fidelis , on November 4, 2025, seems to have sparked some immediate and widespread confusion, driven largely by sensationalist headlines from secular sources. In response to requests, particularly surrounding a potential Fifth Marian Dogma of Spiritual Maternity , the DDF addressed the usage of titles like Co-redemptrix and Mediatrix. Unfortunately, this has led to a large contingent online and in the media claiming that the Church has "tossed out" centuries of doctrine, with some outside the Church even proclaiming a "victory" over Catholic teaching (This may be the saddest part of it all, that we as Christians, are "competing" with each other). It is essential to understand that this doctrinal note is fundamentally about titles and clarity, not doctrine and change according to the Vatican News. The true teachings regarding Mary's unique role in salvation remain inviolabl...

Jesus Came to End Death and to Build a Church

The twelve apostles chosen by Jesus formed the bedrock of the early Church , and their Catholic identity is deeply rooted in their direct relationship with Christ and the mission He entrusted to them. The Catechism of the Catholic Church highlights this foundational role, stating that Jesus "instituted the Twelve as 'the seeds of the new Israel and the beginning of the sacred hierarchy'" ( CCC 860 ). These men were not simply followers; they were handpicked by Jesus, lived intimately with Him, witnessed His miracles and teachings firsthand, and were specifically commissioned to preach the Gospel to all nations ( Matthew 28:19-20 ). Their unique position as eyewitnesses to the life, death, and resurrection of Christ, and their reception of the Holy Spirit at Pentecost, established them as the authoritative leaders of the nascent Church, a reality echoed in the writings of early Church Fathers like Ignatius of Antioch, who emphasized the apostles' authority as repre...
Kurt Hilgefort, is a Catholic father of six who publishes his thoughts on his blog Shadows of Augustine . He responded to my seven question survey with the following answers. Kurt is the first layperson to respond to the seven question survey and I think that his experience is extremely relevant to me personally and I hope that you are inspired by his thoughts as well. If you would like to respond, please send an email to fellmananthony@gmail.com with your thoughts and I will be happy to publish them as well. 1. What is the biggest challenge to your faith that you have faced so far? The biggest challenge for me has been the whole dying to self thing. On an intellectual level, there are no barriers. It comes down to a matter of accepting the authority of the Church that Christ founded upon Peter. My challenge is not in the intellect, but rather in the will. The challenge for me has always been to continually seek conversion. I want to be transformed, but I want it to be over all ...